Question 1

What are the Minnesota PFAS reporting rule requirements?

Accepted Answer

Minnesota’s final PFAS reporting rule requires manufacturers to report all products containing intentionally added PFAS that are sold, offered, or distributed in the state, including online sales. The rule covers a broad product scope, including fluoropolymers such as PTFE. Manufacturers must submit detailed product information, PFAS functions, and concentration ranges through Minnesota’s new PRISM reporting system. A one-time $800 fee per manufacturer applies, and most reported information will be publicly accessible unless trade-secret protection is approved.

Question 2

What is PRISM for PFAS reporting?

Accepted Answer

PRISM (PFAS Reporting and Information System for Manufacturers) is Minnesota’s new online platform for submitting PFAS product data. Launching January 2026, PRISM will serve as the centralized system for Minnesota’s PFAS reporting program and is designed to support multi-state adoption in the future. Manufacturers will use PRISM to register, prepare submissions, report PFAS in products, request waivers, and manage trade-secret claims.

Question 3

What is the Minnesota PFAS reporting deadline?

Accepted Answer

The initial Minnesota PFAS reporting deadline is July 1, 2026. This deadline applies to all in-scope products sold or distributed in the state. Beginning February 2027, manufacturers must report all new products containing intentionally added PFAS by February 1 each year. Ongoing re-reporting is not required unless a product changes, making it essential for companies to maintain a scalable, repeatable PFAS tracking process.

Question 4

What is the BIS 50% Rule (Affiliates Rule)?

Accepted Answer

The BIS 50% Rule is a new U.S. export control requirement that extends Entity List and MEU List restrictions to any company that is 50% or more owned (directly or indirectly) by one or more listed entities. This includes subsidiaries, holding companies, offshore structures, and multi-layer corporate ownership.

Question 5

When will the BIS 50% Rule be fully enforced?

Accepted Answer

The rule becomes fully enforceable in November 2026, but early preparation is essential due to the difficulty of uncovering hidden ownership relationships.

Question 6

What are the risks of BIS 50% Rule non-compliance?

Accepted Answer

Organizations face export privilege loss, regulatory penalties, and significant shipment delays. Many companies now search for BIS 50% Rule penalties and export control enforcement as enforcement tightens.

Question 7

How does Assent support BIS 50% Rule compliance?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s Enhanced Entity Screening integrates AI-powered analysis, ownership tracing, and expert review to:Identify complex indirect ownership chainsUncover offshore or layered affiliatesConsolidate beneficial ownership data across jurisdictionsApply OFAC and BIS style 50% ownership logicProduce defensible evidence for audits and licensing decisions

Question 8

What are Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)?

Accepted Answer

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are toxic chemical substances that resist natural breakdown, remain in the environment for long periods, and build up in living organisms. Examples include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), DDT, and dioxins. POPs can travel long distances through air and water, affecting ecosystems and human health worldwide.

Question 9

What is the EU POPs Regulation (EU 2019/1021)?

Accepted Answer

The EU POPs Regulation, also known as Regulation (EU) 2019/1021, is the European Union’s legal framework for controlling persistent organic pollutants. It enforces the Stockholm Convention by restricting or banning POPs production, use, and disposal to prevent environmental contamination.

Question 10

Which industries are most affected by POPs legislation?

Accepted Answer

Industries such as electronics, automotive, textiles, and construction are most affected by persistent organic pollutant (POP) regulations. These sectors often use materials containing POPs, such as flame retardants, lubricants, or plasticizers, and must comply with EU POPs restrictions to continue selling products in the European Union.

Question 11

How can companies ensure compliance with the EU POPs Regulation?

Accepted Answer

To comply with the EU POPs Regulation, companies should collect full material disclosures (FMDs) from suppliers, perform chemical screening to detect POPs, and use Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Compliance software. Ongoing monitoring of new POPs listings under the Stockholm Convention helps maintain compliance as regulations evolve.

Question 12

Why is compliance management becoming a strategic advantage for suppliers?

Accepted Answer

As global regulations evolve toward product sustainability across the entire product life cycle, customers want partners who deliver on transparency as well as compliance.When customers ask for compliance information, they are also evaluating your reliability as a business partner. Suppliers who respond quickly and accurately demonstrate professionalism and build long-term trust. A mature compliance process shows that you are prepared for future regulations and larger opportunities. Instead of seeing compliance as a box to check, think of it as part of your reputation. It proves that you operate responsibly and transparently. With the right tools and consistent processes, even a small supplier can stand out as a trusted and preferred partner in the supply chain.

Question 13

Why is compliance management becoming harder for suppliers to handle manually?

Accepted Answer

Regulations are expanding in scope and complexity, covering areas like chemical use, labor practices, and sustainability. Many suppliers still manage compliance data with spreadsheets or through email, which can work for a few customers but quickly becomes unmanageable as requirements increase. Manual methods make it easy to miss updates, lose important documentation, or duplicate work across customer requests. As larger manufacturers strengthen their oversight, suppliers who cannot deliver complete and consistent data face delays, additional audits, or even lost contracts.

Question 14

What are compliance management data best practices for suppliers?

Accepted Answer

You do not need a large compliance department to manage growing data demands effectively. Strong compliance management begins with visibility: Knowing what materials you use, which regulations apply, and how to share that information confidently with your customers. With Assent’s sustainability platform, you can manage and automate all your compliance data requests in one place. Instead of juggling multiple spreadsheets and emails, our network-driven system connects you to the same platform used by leading manufacturers. That means you can share accurate, complete information across multiple customers at once, cutting down on repetitive work and response time. Assent’s AI-driven tools also help you identify missing data, flag potential risks, and prepare for future requests more easily.

Question 15

What are the most urgent regulatory deadlines compliance managers should prepare for in Q4 2025?

Accepted Answer

Key upcoming dates include California’s EPR packaging reporting deadline (November 15, 2025) and the EU Deforestation Regulation compliance deadline (December 2025). Both require supplier data collection and verified reporting. Other extended timelines, such as PFAS reporting under TSCA (April 2026) and due diligence obligations under the EU Batteries Regulation (August 2027), should also be factored into long-term planning.

Question 16

How should manufacturers approach PFAS phase-outs and evolving chemical reporting laws?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers should audit their supply chains to identify where PFAS are used in coatings, components, or packaging, and begin developing alternative materials to avoid disruptions. They should also track changes under TSCA Section 8(a)(7) and state-level PFAS bans (such as those in Minnesota and Illinois). Because some PFAS reporting requires historic data dating back to 2011, early data collection is essential to stay compliant and reduce the risk of non-compliance penalties.

Question 17

What practical steps can compliance managers take to stay proactive amid these changes?

Accepted Answer

To stay ahead, compliance managers should:Engage suppliers early to collect accurate, complete data.Centralize compliance records using digital tools that track regulations and reporting requirements.Monitor updates from agencies like the EPA, ECHA, and state authorities to anticipate shifts.Prioritize high-risk areas including PFAS, packaging EPR, and EU product sustainability rules to mitigate costly redesigns or delays.These steps help organizations maintain compliance resilience even as global regulations expand.

Question 18

Why aren’t Safety Data Sheets (SDS) sufficient for product compliance?

Accepted Answer

Safety Data Sheets play an important role in communicating chemical hazards, but they were never designed to prove product compliance. Their scope is limited to hazard communication for substances and mixtures, not finished goods or complex assemblies. Because SDSs vary by region and often omit proprietary or low-percentage substances, they rarely provide a complete picture of what’s inside a product. Manufacturers that rely on SDSs alone risk incomplete data, manual verification work, and exposure to regulatory non-compliance as regulations expand.

Question 19

What causes Full Material Disclosures (FMDs) to become unreliable over time?

Accepted Answer

Full Material Disclosures can initially seem comprehensive, but their accuracy fades quickly. Supplier formulations change, regulatory lists evolve, and proprietary holdbacks can conceal substances that later become restricted. Since FMDs are typically snapshots in time rather than living compliance documents, they can become outdated long before the next reporting cycle. Without a process to continuously update and validate these records, organizations face stale data and blind spots that complicate audits and customer requests.

Question 20

How can companies close the compliance gap between SDS and FMD data?

Accepted Answer

Closing the gap requires a hybrid, data-driven approach. Instead of depending solely on SDSs or FMDs, leading compliance teams combine regulatory declarations, supplier engagement, and automation to maintain accuracy and coverage. This strategy treats material data as a living system — updated, validated, and traceable across the product lifecycle. The result is a more resilient compliance posture, enabling organizations to adapt as regulations, materials, and markets change.

Question 21

Why are compliance data requests getting harder to manage?

Accepted Answer

They’re growing in both volume and complexity. Regulations like PFAS, REACH, and RoHS continue to evolve, often with little notice, and customers frequently ask for slightly different data in unique formats. The result is constant rework and very little time to keep up — even for the most organized teams.

Question 22

What are the main risks of relying on manual processes?

Accepted Answer

Manual tracking through spreadsheets or email introduces both inefficiency and risk. It’s easy for information to get lost, duplicated, or outdated between submissions, and even a single missed update can delay a customer response or cause non-compliance. Over time, these small issues add up to slower workflows and higher stress for compliance teams.Common issues include:Missed regulatory or customer updatesVersion control errorsInconsistent or incomplete data across requests

Question 23

How can technology make compliance work more efficient?

Accepted Answer

The right tools help by centralizing requests, automating routine tasks, and reusing data instead of starting from scratch every time. A platform can store your declarations once, apply them to multiple customers, and update automatically as regulations change.For example:Declarations can be reused across customers and product lines.Regulatory updates are applied automatically within the system.Teams spend less time managing spreadsheets and more time focusing on strategic work.

Question 24

How does the Assent Sustainability Platform support suppliers?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s platform brings compliance management into one system. It shows all your requests in one place, keeps regulatory content up to date, and lets you reuse declarations across customers. By simplifying the process, it helps suppliers stay responsive, confident, and compliant even as demands continue to grow.

Question 25

Which minerals are included in responsible sourcing and SCIP reporting requirements?

Accepted Answer

Responsible minerals programs traditionally focused on the “conflict minerals” (3TGs):TantalumTinTungstenGoldToday, regulators and customers also expect due diligence on extended minerals linked to human rights and sustainability risks:CobaltCopperGraphiteLithiumMicaNickelCompanies should expand their responsible minerals sourcing program to cover both conflict and extended minerals.

Question 26

How can I identify which suppliers are in scope for a responsible minerals sourcing program?

Accepted Answer

Not every supplier must be contacted. To determine scope:Focus on suppliers providing products that contain conflict or extended minerals.Exclude service providers (e.g., legal, accounting) and non-relevant goods (e.g., janitorial supplies, wood, plastics).Collaborate with procurement and engineering teams to confirm which suppliers are material to consumer-facing goods.A scoped supplier list makes responsible minerals due diligence more efficient and avoids unnecessary outreach.

Question 27

Which compliance standards and reporting templates apply to responsible minerals sourcing?

Accepted Answer

Global frameworks and tools that guide compliance include:OECD Due Diligence Guidance (the international standard for responsible sourcing programs)Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) for 3TG reportingExtended Minerals Reporting Template (EMRT) for cobalt, lithium, and other extended mineralsAligning your program with these standards ensures consistency with regulatory expectations.

Question 28

What are the biggest challenges when engaging suppliers on mineral sourcing?

Accepted Answer

The most common challenges include:Finding the right contact: Procurement lists often contain sales emails, not compliance contacts.Educating suppliers: Some may be unfamiliar with conflict or extended minerals requirements.Managing volume: Large supplier networks make manual follow-up inefficient.Clear outreach — with instructions, deadlines, and links to templates — increases response rates and supplier accuracy.

Question 29

How can technology support responsible minerals sourcing compliance?

Accepted Answer

Technology simplifies supplier engagement, tracking, and reporting by:Automating supplier outreach and data collectionCentralizing supplier responses in one platformFlagging risks tied to smelters or specific mineralsReducing manual follow-up and repetitive requestsEnsuring compliance programs adapt to evolving regulationsSolutions such as Assent’s sustainability platform help compliance teams reduce administrative workload while keeping programs aligned with SCIP and conflict minerals reporting requirements.

Question 30

How do I know if my company is required to comply with California SB 261?

Accepted Answer

Even if your business is not listed on CARB’s preliminary list of ~4,150 entities, you may still be responsible for compliance with SB 261 California. The list is incomplete and does not include exemptions. Each company that meets the law’s thresholds must file a climate-related financial risk report starting in 2026.

Question 31

What’s the difference between SB 261 and California SB 253 (the California GHG emissions law)?

Accepted Answer

SB 261 (California SB 261): Requires companies to disclose climate-related financial risks every two yearsSB 253 (California GHG law): Requires annual disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third-party assuranceSome companies will need to comply with both, while others may only fall under one requirement.

Question 32

What steps should my company take now to prepare for SB 261 California compliance?

Accepted Answer

Start by reviewing CARB’s preliminary list and completing the voluntary survey to confirm your status. Then, assess your readiness to produce a TCFD-aligned climate risk report by 2026, coordinate across compliance, finance, and sustainability teams, and prepare for overlapping global requirements like the SEC climate disclosure and the EU CSRD.

Question 33

What’s the difference between a point solution and a platform solution in product compliance?

Accepted Answer

A point solution is a standalone tool built to solve one specific compliance task, like REACH reporting or conflict minerals tracking. It’s efficient for a single use case but doesn’t share data or context with other tools. A platform solution, by contrast, unifies all compliance needs under one connected system. It centralizes supplier, material, and product data so teams can reuse information, automate reporting, and make faster, more informed decisions across multiple regulations.

Question 34

Why do point solutions eventually create complexity for manufacturers?

Accepted Answer

At first, a point solution feels efficient because it solves one immediate problem. But as regulations expand and supply chain data grows, each new point tool adds another silo. Over time, managing multiple databases, supplier surveys, and disconnected reports becomes time-consuming, error-prone, and costly. This fragmentation limits visibility, increases risk, and ultimately slows down compliance teams as requirements multiply.

Question 35

Why are manufacturers shifting from point solutions to platform-based compliance systems?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers are recognizing that compliance data isn’t static,  it’s interconnected. A platform approach treats compliance as an ecosystem, not a checklist. By consolidating tools, data, and workflows, platform solutions improve data quality, boost supplier engagement, and enable proactive risk management. The result is a more scalable, future-ready compliance program that supports business growth instead of hindering it.

Question 36

Why should compliance programs get budget priority during uncertain economic conditions?

Accepted Answer

Because compliance directly protects market access, revenue, and brand reputation. Cutting back can expose your company to costly risks, from shipment delays under trade restrictions to lawsuits tied to PFAS or forced labor laws. Investing in compliance now prevents expensive disruptions later.

Question 37

What's the measurable ROI of compliance investments?

Accepted Answer

Compliance delivers clear, measurable ROI across efficiency, cost, and risk reduction. Key results include:Labor efficiency: Automation reduces manual work by up to 80%, freeing teams to focus on analysis and strategy.Cost savings: Streamlined supplier engagement and reduced consultant fees can save the equivalent of 10–20 full-time employees (FTEs) each year.Risk avoidance: Preventing shipment delays, fines, and lawsuits protects millions in annual revenue and safeguards market access.Time-to-market: Automated reporting cuts response times by up to 80%, helping products reach customers faster.Customer trust: Reliable, verified compliance data strengthens relationships and supports long-term growth.

Question 38

What results have companies achieved with Assent?

Accepted Answer

Assent customers like Ryerson and Argon Medical Devices report up to 80% less manual work, 50% lower resource costs, and faster compliance reporting across thousands of products. These measurable results show how Assent turns compliance from a cost center into a growth driver.

Assent Launches AI-Native Solution to Address Severe Gaps in Compliance and Sustainability Response Management Processes

New Minnesota PFAS Reporting Rule: What it Means for You

The BIS 50% Rule (Affiliates Rule): Get Prepared Now

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification & Its Impact On the Defense Supply Chain

Best Buy PFAS: Retailer Shifts PFAS Risk to Vendors

Understanding Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Compliance

Out of Scope of TSCA? Think Again: Why PFAS Due Diligence Still Matters for Every Manufacturer

How Smart Suppliers Save Time On Compliance Management

Assent Recognizes Manufacturers for Leading Supply Chain Sustainability Programs

Compliance Alert: Q4 2025 Regulatory Shifts & Next Steps

Why a Full Material Disclosure or SDS Can’t Fill the Compliance Gap Alone

How to Manage an Inbox Full of Compliance Requests

How to Create an Effective Responsible Minerals Sourcing Program

California SB 261: Preparing for Climate Risk Disclosure

Product Compliance Software: Platforms vs. Point Solutions

Why Reducing Compliance Risk Is Always a Wise Investment

Category: Blog