Question 1

What are the most urgent regulatory deadlines compliance managers should prepare for in Q4 2025?

Accepted Answer

Key upcoming dates include California’s EPR packaging reporting deadline (November 15, 2025) and the EU Deforestation Regulation compliance deadline (December 2025). Both require supplier data collection and verified reporting. Other extended timelines, such as PFAS reporting under TSCA (April 2026) and due diligence obligations under the EU Batteries Regulation (August 2027), should also be factored into long-term planning.

Question 2

How should manufacturers approach PFAS phase-outs and evolving chemical reporting laws?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers should audit their supply chains to identify where PFAS are used in coatings, components, or packaging, and begin developing alternative materials to avoid disruptions. They should also track changes under TSCA Section 8(a)(7) and state-level PFAS bans (such as those in Minnesota and Illinois). Because some PFAS reporting requires historic data dating back to 2011, early data collection is essential to stay compliant and reduce the risk of non-compliance penalties.

Question 3

What practical steps can compliance managers take to stay proactive amid these changes?

Accepted Answer

To stay ahead, compliance managers should:Engage suppliers early to collect accurate, complete data.Centralize compliance records using digital tools that track regulations and reporting requirements.Monitor updates from agencies like the EPA, ECHA, and state authorities to anticipate shifts.Prioritize high-risk areas including PFAS, packaging EPR, and EU product sustainability rules to mitigate costly redesigns or delays.These steps help organizations maintain compliance resilience even as global regulations expand.

Question 4

Why aren’t Safety Data Sheets (SDS) sufficient for product compliance?

Accepted Answer

Safety Data Sheets play an important role in communicating chemical hazards, but they were never designed to prove product compliance. Their scope is limited to hazard communication for substances and mixtures, not finished goods or complex assemblies. Because SDSs vary by region and often omit proprietary or low-percentage substances, they rarely provide a complete picture of what’s inside a product. Manufacturers that rely on SDSs alone risk incomplete data, manual verification work, and exposure to regulatory non-compliance as regulations expand.

Question 5

What causes Full Material Disclosures (FMDs) to become unreliable over time?

Accepted Answer

Full Material Disclosures can initially seem comprehensive, but their accuracy fades quickly. Supplier formulations change, regulatory lists evolve, and proprietary holdbacks can conceal substances that later become restricted. Since FMDs are typically snapshots in time rather than living compliance documents, they can become outdated long before the next reporting cycle. Without a process to continuously update and validate these records, organizations face stale data and blind spots that complicate audits and customer requests.

Question 6

How can companies close the compliance gap between SDS and FMD data?

Accepted Answer

Closing the gap requires a hybrid, data-driven approach. Instead of depending solely on SDSs or FMDs, leading compliance teams combine regulatory declarations, supplier engagement, and automation to maintain accuracy and coverage. This strategy treats material data as a living system — updated, validated, and traceable across the product lifecycle. The result is a more resilient compliance posture, enabling organizations to adapt as regulations, materials, and markets change.

Question 7

Why are compliance data requests getting harder to manage?

Accepted Answer

They’re growing in both volume and complexity. Regulations like PFAS, REACH, and RoHS continue to evolve, often with little notice, and customers frequently ask for slightly different data in unique formats. The result is constant rework and very little time to keep up — even for the most organized teams.

Question 8

What are the main risks of relying on manual processes?

Accepted Answer

Manual tracking through spreadsheets or email introduces both inefficiency and risk. It’s easy for information to get lost, duplicated, or outdated between submissions, and even a single missed update can delay a customer response or cause non-compliance. Over time, these small issues add up to slower workflows and higher stress for compliance teams.Common issues include:Missed regulatory or customer updatesVersion control errorsInconsistent or incomplete data across requests

Question 9

How can technology make compliance work more efficient?

Accepted Answer

The right tools help by centralizing requests, automating routine tasks, and reusing data instead of starting from scratch every time. A platform can store your declarations once, apply them to multiple customers, and update automatically as regulations change.For example:Declarations can be reused across customers and product lines.Regulatory updates are applied automatically within the system.Teams spend less time managing spreadsheets and more time focusing on strategic work.

Question 10

How does the Assent Sustainability Platform support suppliers?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s platform brings compliance management into one system. It shows all your requests in one place, keeps regulatory content up to date, and lets you reuse declarations across customers. By simplifying the process, it helps suppliers stay responsive, confident, and compliant even as demands continue to grow.

Question 11

Which minerals are included in responsible sourcing and SCIP reporting requirements?

Accepted Answer

Responsible minerals programs traditionally focused on the “conflict minerals” (3TGs):TantalumTinTungstenGoldToday, regulators and customers also expect due diligence on extended minerals linked to human rights and sustainability risks:CobaltCopperGraphiteLithiumMicaNickelCompanies should expand their responsible minerals sourcing program to cover both conflict and extended minerals.

Question 12

How can I identify which suppliers are in scope for a responsible minerals sourcing program?

Accepted Answer

Not every supplier must be contacted. To determine scope:Focus on suppliers providing products that contain conflict or extended minerals.Exclude service providers (e.g., legal, accounting) and non-relevant goods (e.g., janitorial supplies, wood, plastics).Collaborate with procurement and engineering teams to confirm which suppliers are material to consumer-facing goods.A scoped supplier list makes responsible minerals due diligence more efficient and avoids unnecessary outreach.

Question 13

Which compliance standards and reporting templates apply to responsible minerals sourcing?

Accepted Answer

Global frameworks and tools that guide compliance include:OECD Due Diligence Guidance (the international standard for responsible sourcing programs)Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) for 3TG reportingExtended Minerals Reporting Template (EMRT) for cobalt, lithium, and other extended mineralsAligning your program with these standards ensures consistency with regulatory expectations.

Question 14

What are the biggest challenges when engaging suppliers on mineral sourcing?

Accepted Answer

The most common challenges include:Finding the right contact: Procurement lists often contain sales emails, not compliance contacts.Educating suppliers: Some may be unfamiliar with conflict or extended minerals requirements.Managing volume: Large supplier networks make manual follow-up inefficient.Clear outreach — with instructions, deadlines, and links to templates — increases response rates and supplier accuracy.

Question 15

How can technology support responsible minerals sourcing compliance?

Accepted Answer

Technology simplifies supplier engagement, tracking, and reporting by:Automating supplier outreach and data collectionCentralizing supplier responses in one platformFlagging risks tied to smelters or specific mineralsReducing manual follow-up and repetitive requestsEnsuring compliance programs adapt to evolving regulationsSolutions such as Assent’s sustainability platform help compliance teams reduce administrative workload while keeping programs aligned with SCIP and conflict minerals reporting requirements.

Question 16

What’s the difference between a point solution and a platform solution in product compliance?

Accepted Answer

A point solution is a standalone tool built to solve one specific compliance task, like REACH reporting or conflict minerals tracking. It’s efficient for a single use case but doesn’t share data or context with other tools. A platform solution, by contrast, unifies all compliance needs under one connected system. It centralizes supplier, material, and product data so teams can reuse information, automate reporting, and make faster, more informed decisions across multiple regulations.

Question 17

Why do point solutions eventually create complexity for manufacturers?

Accepted Answer

At first, a point solution feels efficient because it solves one immediate problem. But as regulations expand and supply chain data grows, each new point tool adds another silo. Over time, managing multiple databases, supplier surveys, and disconnected reports becomes time-consuming, error-prone, and costly. This fragmentation limits visibility, increases risk, and ultimately slows down compliance teams as requirements multiply.

Question 18

Why are manufacturers shifting from point solutions to platform-based compliance systems?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers are recognizing that compliance data isn’t static,  it’s interconnected. A platform approach treats compliance as an ecosystem, not a checklist. By consolidating tools, data, and workflows, platform solutions improve data quality, boost supplier engagement, and enable proactive risk management. The result is a more scalable, future-ready compliance program that supports business growth instead of hindering it.

Question 19

Why should compliance programs get budget priority during uncertain economic conditions?

Accepted Answer

Because compliance directly protects market access, revenue, and brand reputation. Cutting back can expose your company to costly risks, from shipment delays under trade restrictions to lawsuits tied to PFAS or forced labor laws. Investing in compliance now prevents expensive disruptions later.

Question 20

What's the measurable ROI of compliance investments?

Accepted Answer

Compliance delivers clear, measurable ROI across efficiency, cost, and risk reduction. Key results include:Labor efficiency: Automation reduces manual work by up to 80%, freeing teams to focus on analysis and strategy.Cost savings: Streamlined supplier engagement and reduced consultant fees can save the equivalent of 10–20 full-time employees (FTEs) each year.Risk avoidance: Preventing shipment delays, fines, and lawsuits protects millions in annual revenue and safeguards market access.Time-to-market: Automated reporting cuts response times by up to 80%, helping products reach customers faster.Customer trust: Reliable, verified compliance data strengthens relationships and supports long-term growth.

Question 21

What results have companies achieved with Assent?

Accepted Answer

Assent customers like Ryerson and Argon Medical Devices report up to 80% less manual work, 50% lower resource costs, and faster compliance reporting across thousands of products. These measurable results show how Assent turns compliance from a cost center into a growth driver.

Question 22

What to look for in a supply chain sustainability management software?

Accepted Answer

A strong platform does more than collect supplier data, it should also help you stay compliant as regulations evolve and proactively identify risks. Look for product compliance software that combines regulatory updates, automated data validation, and support from regulatory experts.  The best solutions turn complex compliance demands into clear, actionable insights that give you a competitive advantage. Ask potential vendors for customer success stories and independent third-party analysis of their platform.

Question 23

What should organizations look for when evaluating data security in supply chain management software?

Accepted Answer

Data protection should be treated as a core business risk, not a technical detail. Look for software providers that follow recognized security frameworks such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001, apply encryption and access controls, and maintain transparency around data storage, ownership, and governance.

Question 24

How does supply chain sustainability management software keep up with changing regulations?

Accepted Answer

Regulations like REACH, RoHS, and PFAS restrictions evolve constantly, making it critical that your software provider stays ahead of updates. Assent’s in-house regulatory experts continuously monitor and interpret global compliance changes, ensuring the platform, substance lists, and templates are updated in real time. This expert-driven approach means you’re always working with the most current information, supported by specialists who understand how new laws impact your products and market access.

Popular Posts

Sustainability Experts Clear the Air on the Most Confusing & Misused ESG Buzzwords

The Future of Sustainability: Introducing Assent’s Sustainability Roadmap

Canadian PFAS Reporting Crash Course

The Latest

Quick Filter

Filter by:

Assent Recognizes Manufacturers for Leading Supply Chain Sustainability Programs

Compliance Alert: Q4 2025 Regulatory Shifts & Next Steps

Why a Full Material Disclosure or SDS Can’t Fill the Compliance Gap Alone

Simplify Compliance, Amplify Results

How to Manage an Inbox Full of Compliance Requests

How to Create an Effective Responsible Minerals Sourcing Program

Product Compliance Software: Platforms vs. Point Solutions

Why Reducing Compliance Risk Is Always a Wise Investment

The Assent Solution Guide: Delivering Deep Supply Chain Sustainability

Know Before You Buy: 5 Questions for Supply Chain Software Vendors

Stay in the Know

Ready to book a demo?