Question 1

What are the Minnesota PFAS reporting rule requirements?

Accepted Answer

Minnesota’s final PFAS reporting rule requires manufacturers to report all products containing intentionally added PFAS that are sold, offered, or distributed in the state, including online sales. The rule covers a broad product scope, including fluoropolymers such as PTFE. Manufacturers must submit detailed product information, PFAS functions, and concentration ranges through Minnesota’s new PRISM reporting system. A one-time $800 fee per manufacturer applies, and most reported information will be publicly accessible unless trade-secret protection is approved.

Question 2

What is PRISM for PFAS reporting?

Accepted Answer

PRISM (PFAS Reporting and Information System for Manufacturers) is Minnesota’s online platform for submitting PFAS product data. Launched in January 2026, PRISM serves as the centralized system for Minnesota’s PFAS reporting program and is designed to support multi-state adoption in the future. Manufacturers will use PRISM to register, prepare submissions, report PFAS in products, request waivers, and manage trade-secret claims.

Question 3

What is the Minnesota PFAS reporting deadline?

Accepted Answer

The initial Minnesota PFAS reporting deadline is September 15, 2026. In the original rule, the deadline was July 1, 2026, but this was pushed back in an update published on April 15, 2026. This deadline applies to all in-scope products sold or distributed in the state. Beginning February 2027, manufacturers must report all new products containing intentionally added PFAS by February 1 each year. Ongoing re-reporting is not required unless a product changes, making it essential for companies to maintain a scalable, repeatable PFAS tracking process.

Question 4

What is Section 232 and why does it matter for steel, aluminum, and copper imports?

Accepted Answer

Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act allows the president to impose tariffs if imports threaten national security. Since 2018, this has led to significant tariffs on steel and aluminum, and in 2025, copper was added. Importers must now provide detailed supply chain data (such as country of smelt, cast, melt, and pour) to avoid duties up to 200%.

Question 5

How can importers stay compliant with Section 232 reporting requirements?

Accepted Answer

Importers should:Collect mill test certificates, certificates of analysis, or supplier attestationsEngage suppliers early to ensure smelt/melt data is availableUse trade compliance software to trace metals back to the smelterWork with compliance experts to interpret CBP updates and avoid costly penalties

Question 6

What are the risks of not complying with Section 232 tariff requirements?

Accepted Answer

If importers cannot prove the country of smelt, cast, melt, or pour, U.S. CBP may assume the material originated from a restricted country (such as Russia). This can trigger a 200% duty, shipment delays, or even having goods stopped at the border. Lack of documentation creates significant financial and operational risks.

Question 7

What are the phases of CBAM implementation?

Accepted Answer

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is being implemented in two phases: a transitional phase and a permanent phase.The CBAM transitional phase runs from October 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025 and requires EU importers to report the embedded greenhouse gas emissions of in-scope goods on a quarterly basis, without purchasing CBAM certificates.The CBAM permanent phase begins on January 1, 2026. From this point forward, importers must submit annual emissions declarations and purchase CBAM certificates to cover a growing share of embedded emissions, with full financial coverage required by 2034.

Question 8

What is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)?

Accepted Answer

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is an EU regulation that places a carbon price on certain imported goods based on their embedded emissions.CBAM is designed to prevent carbon leakage by ensuring imported products face a comparable carbon cost to goods produced within the EU under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). The regulation currently applies to carbon-intensive goods such as iron and steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen, and requires importers to calculate and report emissions using defined EU methodologies.

Question 9

What is a CBAM certificate?

Accepted Answer

A CBAM certificate is a tradable unit that represents one tonne of CO₂-equivalent emissions embedded in imported goods subject to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.During the CBAM permanent phase, EU importers must purchase and surrender CBAM certificates annually to account for the emissions associated with their imports. Certificate prices are linked to the average EU ETS carbon price, and the number of certificates required may be reduced if a carbon price was already paid in the country of origin. Accurate supplier emissions data helps minimize certificate costs.

Question 10

What is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)?

Accepted Answer

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a regulatory approach that shifts the responsibility for managing a product’s end-of-life—from governments and taxpayers—onto the producers. Manufacturers are required to cover costs for collection, recycling, and safe disposal, and may also need to design products with sustainability and recyclability in mind.

Question 11

Why should U.S. manufacturers care about EPR now?

Accepted Answer

EPR is no longer limited to the EU. The U.S. already has 146 EPR laws across 35 states, with packaging rules expanding rapidly in states like California, Oregon, and Colorado. Manufacturers face growing compliance fees, reporting requirements, and recycling targets, making it critical to build EPR programs now.

Question 12

How can companies manage EPR compliance effectively?

Accepted Answer

To comply with EPR, companies need strong supply chain visibility, accurate materials data, and systems for reporting across multiple jurisdictions. Platforms like Assent simplify compliance by collecting supplier data, managing reporting workflows, and preparing documentation for Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs).

Question 13

What is the Stop-the-Clock mechanism in the EU Omnibus Simplification Package?

Accepted Answer

The Stop-the-Clock mechanism delays the reporting deadlines under the CSRD and CS3D. It gives large companies and listed SMEs more time to prepare by pushing back CSRD reporting for second- and third-wave companies by two years and delaying the CS3D start date by one year.

Question 14

Does the Stop-the-Clock mean companies can pause CSRD or CS3D preparation?

Accepted Answer

No. The directives still apply, and companies should continue building their sustainability data programs. The delay offers time to simplify processes — but reporting requirements remain.

Question 15

Are non-EU companies affected by the CSRD or CS3D delays?

Accepted Answer

Non-EU companies with EU customers or operations still need to collect supply sustainability data. The timeline postponement gives non-EU companies more time to get their sustainability programs in order.

Popular Posts

Canadian PFAS Reporting Crash Course

RoHS Vs REACH Compliance

Sustainability Experts Clear the Air on the Most Confusing & Misused ESG Buzzwords

Stay in the Know

The Latest

Quick Filter

Filter by:

How to Get Ahead in Q3: Your Product Material Compliance Priorities

What Is the CBAM Financial Impact for Importers?

How EPR is Transforming Product Compliance for U.S. Manufacturers

Simplify Compliance, Amplify Results

What Is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)?

No, Supply Chain Sustainability Isn’t Going Away

Q2 2025 Quarterly Innovation Updates

CSRD Reporting: Stop-the-Clock Omnibus Proposal Approved

The Assent Solution Guide: Delivering Deep Supply Chain Sustainability

Quarterly Innovation Spotlight: Learn How Assent Is Simplifying Supply Chain Sustainability

Ready to book a demo?