Question 1

What are the most urgent regulatory deadlines compliance managers should prepare for in Q4 2025?

Accepted Answer

Key upcoming dates include California’s EPR packaging reporting deadline (November 15, 2025) and the EU Deforestation Regulation compliance deadline (December 2025). Both require supplier data collection and verified reporting. Other extended timelines, such as PFAS reporting under TSCA (April 2026) and due diligence obligations under the EU Batteries Regulation (August 2027), should also be factored into long-term planning.

Question 2

How should manufacturers approach PFAS phase-outs and evolving chemical reporting laws?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers should audit their supply chains to identify where PFAS are used in coatings, components, or packaging, and begin developing alternative materials to avoid disruptions. They should also track changes under TSCA Section 8(a)(7) and state-level PFAS bans (such as those in Minnesota and Illinois). Because some PFAS reporting requires historic data dating back to 2011, early data collection is essential to stay compliant and reduce the risk of non-compliance penalties.

Question 3

What practical steps can compliance managers take to stay proactive amid these changes?

Accepted Answer

To stay ahead, compliance managers should:Engage suppliers early to collect accurate, complete data.Centralize compliance records using digital tools that track regulations and reporting requirements.Monitor updates from agencies like the EPA, ECHA, and state authorities to anticipate shifts.Prioritize high-risk areas including PFAS, packaging EPR, and EU product sustainability rules to mitigate costly redesigns or delays.These steps help organizations maintain compliance resilience even as global regulations expand.

Question 4

Why aren’t Safety Data Sheets (SDS) sufficient for product compliance?

Accepted Answer

Safety Data Sheets play an important role in communicating chemical hazards, but they were never designed to prove product compliance. Their scope is limited to hazard communication for substances and mixtures, not finished goods or complex assemblies. Because SDSs vary by region and often omit proprietary or low-percentage substances, they rarely provide a complete picture of what’s inside a product. Manufacturers that rely on SDSs alone risk incomplete data, manual verification work, and exposure to regulatory non-compliance as regulations expand.

Question 5

What causes Full Material Disclosures (FMDs) to become unreliable over time?

Accepted Answer

Full Material Disclosures can initially seem comprehensive, but their accuracy fades quickly. Supplier formulations change, regulatory lists evolve, and proprietary holdbacks can conceal substances that later become restricted. Since FMDs are typically snapshots in time rather than living compliance documents, they can become outdated long before the next reporting cycle. Without a process to continuously update and validate these records, organizations face stale data and blind spots that complicate audits and customer requests.

Question 6

How can companies close the compliance gap between SDS and FMD data?

Accepted Answer

Closing the gap requires a hybrid, data-driven approach. Instead of depending solely on SDSs or FMDs, leading compliance teams combine regulatory declarations, supplier engagement, and automation to maintain accuracy and coverage. This strategy treats material data as a living system — updated, validated, and traceable across the product lifecycle. The result is a more resilient compliance posture, enabling organizations to adapt as regulations, materials, and markets change.

Question 7

Why are compliance data requests getting harder to manage?

Accepted Answer

They’re growing in both volume and complexity. Regulations like PFAS, REACH, and RoHS continue to evolve, often with little notice, and customers frequently ask for slightly different data in unique formats. The result is constant rework and very little time to keep up — even for the most organized teams.

Question 8

What are the main risks of relying on manual processes?

Accepted Answer

Manual tracking through spreadsheets or email introduces both inefficiency and risk. It’s easy for information to get lost, duplicated, or outdated between submissions, and even a single missed update can delay a customer response or cause non-compliance. Over time, these small issues add up to slower workflows and higher stress for compliance teams.Common issues include:Missed regulatory or customer updatesVersion control errorsInconsistent or incomplete data across requests

Question 9

How can technology make compliance work more efficient?

Accepted Answer

The right tools help by centralizing requests, automating routine tasks, and reusing data instead of starting from scratch every time. A platform can store your declarations once, apply them to multiple customers, and update automatically as regulations change.For example:Declarations can be reused across customers and product lines.Regulatory updates are applied automatically within the system.Teams spend less time managing spreadsheets and more time focusing on strategic work.

Question 10

How does the Assent Sustainability Platform support suppliers?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s platform brings compliance management into one system. It shows all your requests in one place, keeps regulatory content up to date, and lets you reuse declarations across customers. By simplifying the process, it helps suppliers stay responsive, confident, and compliant even as demands continue to grow.

Question 11

What’s the difference between a point solution and a platform solution in product compliance?

Accepted Answer

A point solution is a standalone tool built to solve one specific compliance task, like REACH reporting or conflict minerals tracking. It’s efficient for a single use case but doesn’t share data or context with other tools. A platform solution, by contrast, unifies all compliance needs under one connected system. It centralizes supplier, material, and product data so teams can reuse information, automate reporting, and make faster, more informed decisions across multiple regulations.

Question 12

Why do point solutions eventually create complexity for manufacturers?

Accepted Answer

At first, a point solution feels efficient because it solves one immediate problem. But as regulations expand and supply chain data grows, each new point tool adds another silo. Over time, managing multiple databases, supplier surveys, and disconnected reports becomes time-consuming, error-prone, and costly. This fragmentation limits visibility, increases risk, and ultimately slows down compliance teams as requirements multiply.

Question 13

Why are manufacturers shifting from point solutions to platform-based compliance systems?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers are recognizing that compliance data isn’t static,  it’s interconnected. A platform approach treats compliance as an ecosystem, not a checklist. By consolidating tools, data, and workflows, platform solutions improve data quality, boost supplier engagement, and enable proactive risk management. The result is a more scalable, future-ready compliance program that supports business growth instead of hindering it.

Question 14

Why should compliance programs get budget priority during uncertain economic conditions?

Accepted Answer

Because compliance directly protects market access, revenue, and brand reputation. Cutting back can expose your company to costly risks, from shipment delays under trade restrictions to lawsuits tied to PFAS or forced labor laws. Investing in compliance now prevents expensive disruptions later.

Question 15

What's the measurable ROI of compliance investments?

Accepted Answer

Compliance delivers clear, measurable ROI across efficiency, cost, and risk reduction. Key results include:Labor efficiency: Automation reduces manual work by up to 80%, freeing teams to focus on analysis and strategy.Cost savings: Streamlined supplier engagement and reduced consultant fees can save the equivalent of 10–20 full-time employees (FTEs) each year.Risk avoidance: Preventing shipment delays, fines, and lawsuits protects millions in annual revenue and safeguards market access.Time-to-market: Automated reporting cuts response times by up to 80%, helping products reach customers faster.Customer trust: Reliable, verified compliance data strengthens relationships and supports long-term growth.

Question 16

What results have companies achieved with Assent?

Accepted Answer

Assent customers like Ryerson and Argon Medical Devices report up to 80% less manual work, 50% lower resource costs, and faster compliance reporting across thousands of products. These measurable results show how Assent turns compliance from a cost center into a growth driver.

Question 17

What to look for in a supply chain sustainability management software?

Accepted Answer

A strong platform does more than collect supplier data, it should also help you stay compliant as regulations evolve and proactively identify risks. Look for product compliance software that combines regulatory updates, automated data validation, and support from regulatory experts.  The best solutions turn complex compliance demands into clear, actionable insights that give you a competitive advantage. Ask potential vendors for customer success stories and independent third-party analysis of their platform.

Question 18

What should organizations look for when evaluating data security in supply chain management software?

Accepted Answer

Data protection should be treated as a core business risk, not a technical detail. Look for software providers that follow recognized security frameworks such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001, apply encryption and access controls, and maintain transparency around data storage, ownership, and governance.

Question 19

How does supply chain sustainability management software keep up with changing regulations?

Accepted Answer

Regulations like REACH, RoHS, and PFAS restrictions evolve constantly, making it critical that your software provider stays ahead of updates. Assent’s in-house regulatory experts continuously monitor and interpret global compliance changes, ensuring the platform, substance lists, and templates are updated in real time. This expert-driven approach means you’re always working with the most current information, supported by specialists who understand how new laws impact your products and market access.

Question 20

What’s the difference between a low-cost supply chain solution and a high-value one?

Accepted Answer

Low-cost platforms typically automate basic data collection and reporting, while high-value solutions connect compliance, supplier management, and analytics in one system. A robust supply chain sustainability software platform integrates regulatory intelligence, supplier engagement, and predictive insights to enable proactive risk management and measurable productivity gains.

Question 21

How can I measure the ROI of a supply chain or product compliance software investment?

Accepted Answer

ROI should reflect both cost savings and performance improvements. The strongest indicators include faster supplier response rates, reduced manual data validation, lower external consulting costs, and improved market access. Assent users have reported 2–3X productivity gains when compliance data drives business decisions rather than just meeting reporting requirements.

Question 22

Where do manufacturers see the greatest time and cost savings from supply chain software?

Accepted Answer

The biggest impact comes from automation that replaces data analysis and compliance risk mitigation, including supplier outreach, data validation, and regulatory updates. By centralizing and validating data automatically, teams spend less time managing spreadsheets and more time reducing risk or preparing for audits. Over time, these efficiencies cut administrative overhead and shorten time-to-market. One Assent customer, Pico Technology, saved approximately 2,000 staff hours annually by implementing Assent’s platform.

Question 23

How can I tell if a product compliance platform will deliver long-term value?

Accepted Answer

Look for signs of scalability and expertise. A future-ready platform should evolve with new regulations, integrate seamlessly with ERP and PLM systems, and include access to compliance experts who guide ongoing program growth. That combination — technology plus expertise — is what defines a sustainable ROI.

Question 24

Why are supply chain regulations being delayed in 2025?

Accepted Answer

Regulatory delays are happening because governments are upgrading the systems used to collect and verify compliance data. For example, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) and EU Batteries Regulation (EUBR) are being aligned with new corporate due diligence laws. These changes are designed to create consistent, digital, and enforceable reporting standards across markets — not to weaken or remove existing requirements.

Question 25

Do supply chain regulation delays reduce the amount of compliance data manufacturers need to report?

Accepted Answer

No. They’re becoming more structured. Regulators are harmonizing rules across markets, meaning manufacturers will soon be submitting similar types of product, material, and sourcing data through interconnected systems. Acting now helps ensure your internal data is organized to meet those future requirements smoothly.

Question 26

How can manufacturers use regulatory delay periods to strengthen product compliance and sustainability programs?

Accepted Answer

This is the right moment to test your data collection processes, train suppliers, and evaluate your technology stack. Investing in supply chain sustainability software or product compliance software can help you centralize supplier data, automate outreach, and prepare for a more digital reporting environment.

Question 27

What do current regulatory delays reveal about the future of global compliance?

Accepted Answer

The era of manual compliance and supply chain data management programs is ending. Global regulations are moving toward continuous, data-driven oversight where transparency, traceability, and verified reporting define competitiveness. Manufacturers that invest now in digital data management and proactive compliance will be better equipped to adapt to global sustainability rules and gain a competitive advantage.

Question 28

Is the DDRT mandatory?

Accepted Answer

The template itself isn’t a legal mandate. It’s an industry standard many OEMs support to streamline disclosures. Still, suppliers can expect customers to request it and demand action on identified risks.

Question 29

If I use the DDRT, do I still need a supply chain sustainability platform?

Accepted Answer

Yes. The DDRT standardizes how information is requested and disclosed, but regulators and OEMs still expect verifiable due diligence and corrective actions. A platform like Assent helps you operationalize those requirements and prove results.

Question 30

Does Assent help with the DDRT?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s Forced Labor solution complements the DDRT by enabling supplier engagement, monitoring, evidence review, remediation tracking, and standardized reporting across regulations.

Question 31

What are the key changes to RoHS lead exemptions?

Accepted Answer

The European Commission has adopted delegated directives to revoke and renew key RoHS lead exemptions, including those for lead as an alloying element in steel, aluminum, and copper, lead in high melting temperature solder, and lead in glass or ceramic components. Some exemptions have been revoked with a phase-out period of 12–18 months, while others have been renewed with a new expiry date of June 30, 2027, or December 31, 2027. These changes could significantly impact global manufacturing supply chains.

Question 32

Who is affected by these changes?

Accepted Answer

Any company placing electrical and electronic products, or their parts, on the market in the European Economic Area (EEA). Affected organizations, including suppliers, need to determine if lead is present in their products or parts and whether they will continue to need these exemptions. Time is limited to transition to lead-free parts or apply for the renewal of necessary exemptions.

Question 33

What actions should companies take to comply with these new regulations?

Accepted Answer

Collaborate with suppliers to gain transparency into the use of lead in partsIdentify which exemptions are used in your supply chain for the use of leadEvaluate whether it’s feasible to transition to lead-free alternativesJoin trade associations or working groups to coordinate exemption renewal applications, especially for those expiring on June 30, 2027. Applications for these must be submitted by December 31, 2025.

Question 34

Who is responsible for ensuring compliance with the EU RoHS Directive?

Accepted Answer

Compliance is the responsibility of manufacturers and importers of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) into the EU. Manufacturers and importers must self-declare compliance and may face checks or market surveillance by EU member states. If found non-compliant, manufacturers and importers must demonstrate due diligence, including robust communication with suppliers and subcontractors to ensure compliance throughout the manufacturing process.

Question 35

How can Assent’s EU RoHS solution support your proactive compliance efforts?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s EU RoHS solution provides tools to manage compliance, such as:Proactive notifications for RoHS exemption expirationsAutomated product declarations and BOM (bill of material) roll-upsReal-time reporting to monitor compliance statusThese features streamline the compliance process and help producers maintain a strong due diligence record.

Question 36

What is supply chain sustainability?

Accepted Answer

Supply chain sustainability is the practice of reducing environmental and social risks across every stage of the supply chain. It looks at where materials come from, how they are produced, and how suppliers operate, with the goal of building resilience and long-term business growth.

Question 37

Why is sustainable supply chain management important?

Accepted Answer

Sustainable supply chain management helps protect businesses from disruptions, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. It also improves efficiency, strengthens supplier relationships, and supports responsible sourcing to ensure products can be sold in global markets.

Question 38

What are the key elements of a sustainable supply chain?

Accepted Answer

A sustainable supply chain addresses:Environmental impacts such as emissions, waste, and resource use.Social responsibility including safe working conditions, fair labor practices, and human rights.Strong governance practices like supplier codes of conduct and ethical business standards.

Question 39

How does supply chain sustainability software help?

Accepted Answer

Supply chain sustainability software simplifies the process of collecting supplier data, monitoring risks, and keeping up with changing regulations. It streamlines supplier engagement, reduces reporting fatigue, and gives companies visibility into risks that could otherwise remain hidden.

Question 40

How can a company begin improving supply chain sustainability?

Accepted Answer

The first steps are to document goals, identify applicable regulations, and set clear requirements for suppliers through codes of conduct and data requests. Many companies also partner with sustainability solution providers to gain expertise, implement software, and ensure programs scale effectively.

Question 41

What is the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation, and who is required to comply?

Accepted Answer

The EU Conflict Minerals Regulation is a European Union law that came into effect on January 1, 2021. It requires EU importers of conflict minerals — specifically tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold (3TGs) — to conduct due diligence to ensure their sourcing does not contribute to armed conflict or human rights violations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or other conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRAs). Importers must assess smelters and refiners in their supply chains and submit appropriate conflict minerals declarations.

Question 42

What is a Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) and how is it used?

Accepted Answer

The CMRT is a standardized document developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI). It is used to collect information about smelters and refiners from suppliers and forms the backbone of most conflict minerals compliance programs. Companies use the CMRT to track the source of conflict minerals in their products and report data as required under regulations like the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation and Section 1502 of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act.

Question 43

Does cobalt count as a conflict mineral under the European Union regulation?

Accepted Answer

Cobalt is currently not classified as a conflict mineral under the EU regulation on conflict minerals, which focuses specifically on tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold. However, cobalt has increasingly come under scrutiny due to its sourcing risks, particularly in the DRC, and may be included in future regulatory updates or voluntary disclosure frameworks.

Question 44

How can conflict minerals compliance software support your reporting efforts?

Accepted Answer

Conflict minerals software helps automate supplier outreach, CMRT data collection, smelter risk scoring, and report generation. Advanced tools such as those offered by Assent enable companies to simplify compliance with the European Union Conflict Minerals Regulation while reducing the administrative burden. This software is especially valuable for complex manufacturers managing high volumes of supplier data across global operations.

Question 45

What does a conflict minerals compliance program typically include?

Accepted Answer

A robust conflict minerals compliance program includes several key elements:Identifying in-scope products and suppliersCollecting supplier declarations on material origins (e.g. by gathering CMRTs)Conducting risk assessments on smelters and refinersAuditing data for accuracyPublishing a conflict minerals reportThese steps help companies meet regulatory obligations and support ethical sourcing across their global supply chains.

Question 46

How can conflict minerals compliance software support your reporting efforts?

Accepted Answer

Conflict minerals software helps automate supplier outreach, CMRT data collection, smelter risk scoring, and report generation. Advanced tools such as those offered by Assent enable companies to simplify compliance with the European Union Conflict Minerals Regulation while reducing the administrative burden. This software is especially valuable for complex manufacturers managing high volumes of supplier data across global operations.

Question 47

What are the most urgent regulatory deadlines compliance managers should prepare for in Q4 2025?

Accepted Answer

Key upcoming dates include California’s EPR packaging reporting deadline (November 15, 2025) and the EU Deforestation Regulation compliance deadline (December 2025). Both require supplier data collection and verified reporting. Other extended timelines, such as PFAS reporting under TSCA (April 2026) and due diligence obligations under the EU Batteries Regulation (August 2027), should also be factored into long-term planning.

Question 48

How should manufacturers approach PFAS phase-outs and evolving chemical reporting laws?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers should audit their supply chains to identify where PFAS are used in coatings, components, or packaging, and begin developing alternative materials to avoid disruptions. They should also track changes under TSCA Section 8(a)(7) and state-level PFAS bans (such as those in Minnesota and Illinois). Because some PFAS reporting requires historic data dating back to 2011, early data collection is essential to stay compliant and reduce the risk of non-compliance penalties.

Question 49

What practical steps can compliance managers take to stay proactive amid these changes?

Accepted Answer

To stay ahead, compliance managers should:Engage suppliers early to collect accurate, complete data.Centralize compliance records using digital tools that track regulations and reporting requirements.Monitor updates from agencies like the EPA, ECHA, and state authorities to anticipate shifts.Prioritize high-risk areas including PFAS, packaging EPR, and EU product sustainability rules to mitigate costly redesigns or delays.These steps help organizations maintain compliance resilience even as global regulations expand.

Question 50

Why aren’t Safety Data Sheets (SDS) sufficient for product compliance?

Accepted Answer

Safety Data Sheets play an important role in communicating chemical hazards, but they were never designed to prove product compliance. Their scope is limited to hazard communication for substances and mixtures, not finished goods or complex assemblies. Because SDSs vary by region and often omit proprietary or low-percentage substances, they rarely provide a complete picture of what’s inside a product. Manufacturers that rely on SDSs alone risk incomplete data, manual verification work, and exposure to regulatory non-compliance as regulations expand.

Question 51

What causes Full Material Disclosures (FMDs) to become unreliable over time?

Accepted Answer

Full Material Disclosures can initially seem comprehensive, but their accuracy fades quickly. Supplier formulations change, regulatory lists evolve, and proprietary holdbacks can conceal substances that later become restricted. Since FMDs are typically snapshots in time rather than living compliance documents, they can become outdated long before the next reporting cycle. Without a process to continuously update and validate these records, organizations face stale data and blind spots that complicate audits and customer requests.

Question 52

How can companies close the compliance gap between SDS and FMD data?

Accepted Answer

Closing the gap requires a hybrid, data-driven approach. Instead of depending solely on SDSs or FMDs, leading compliance teams combine regulatory declarations, supplier engagement, and automation to maintain accuracy and coverage. This strategy treats material data as a living system — updated, validated, and traceable across the product lifecycle. The result is a more resilient compliance posture, enabling organizations to adapt as regulations, materials, and markets change.

Question 53

Why are compliance data requests getting harder to manage?

Accepted Answer

They’re growing in both volume and complexity. Regulations like PFAS, REACH, and RoHS continue to evolve, often with little notice, and customers frequently ask for slightly different data in unique formats. The result is constant rework and very little time to keep up — even for the most organized teams.

Question 54

What are the main risks of relying on manual processes?

Accepted Answer

Manual tracking through spreadsheets or email introduces both inefficiency and risk. It’s easy for information to get lost, duplicated, or outdated between submissions, and even a single missed update can delay a customer response or cause non-compliance. Over time, these small issues add up to slower workflows and higher stress for compliance teams.Common issues include:Missed regulatory or customer updatesVersion control errorsInconsistent or incomplete data across requests

Question 55

How can technology make compliance work more efficient?

Accepted Answer

The right tools help by centralizing requests, automating routine tasks, and reusing data instead of starting from scratch every time. A platform can store your declarations once, apply them to multiple customers, and update automatically as regulations change.For example:Declarations can be reused across customers and product lines.Regulatory updates are applied automatically within the system.Teams spend less time managing spreadsheets and more time focusing on strategic work.

Question 56

How does the Assent Sustainability Platform support suppliers?

Accepted Answer

Assent’s platform brings compliance management into one system. It shows all your requests in one place, keeps regulatory content up to date, and lets you reuse declarations across customers. By simplifying the process, it helps suppliers stay responsive, confident, and compliant even as demands continue to grow.

Question 57

What’s the difference between a point solution and a platform solution in product compliance?

Accepted Answer

A point solution is a standalone tool built to solve one specific compliance task, like REACH reporting or conflict minerals tracking. It’s efficient for a single use case but doesn’t share data or context with other tools. A platform solution, by contrast, unifies all compliance needs under one connected system. It centralizes supplier, material, and product data so teams can reuse information, automate reporting, and make faster, more informed decisions across multiple regulations.

Question 58

Why do point solutions eventually create complexity for manufacturers?

Accepted Answer

At first, a point solution feels efficient because it solves one immediate problem. But as regulations expand and supply chain data grows, each new point tool adds another silo. Over time, managing multiple databases, supplier surveys, and disconnected reports becomes time-consuming, error-prone, and costly. This fragmentation limits visibility, increases risk, and ultimately slows down compliance teams as requirements multiply.

Question 59

Why are manufacturers shifting from point solutions to platform-based compliance systems?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers are recognizing that compliance data isn’t static,  it’s interconnected. A platform approach treats compliance as an ecosystem, not a checklist. By consolidating tools, data, and workflows, platform solutions improve data quality, boost supplier engagement, and enable proactive risk management. The result is a more scalable, future-ready compliance program that supports business growth instead of hindering it.

Question 60

Why should compliance programs get budget priority during uncertain economic conditions?

Accepted Answer

Because compliance directly protects market access, revenue, and brand reputation. Cutting back can expose your company to costly risks, from shipment delays under trade restrictions to lawsuits tied to PFAS or forced labor laws. Investing in compliance now prevents expensive disruptions later.

Question 61

What's the measurable ROI of compliance investments?

Accepted Answer

Compliance delivers clear, measurable ROI across efficiency, cost, and risk reduction. Key results include:Labor efficiency: Automation reduces manual work by up to 80%, freeing teams to focus on analysis and strategy.Cost savings: Streamlined supplier engagement and reduced consultant fees can save the equivalent of 10–20 full-time employees (FTEs) each year.Risk avoidance: Preventing shipment delays, fines, and lawsuits protects millions in annual revenue and safeguards market access.Time-to-market: Automated reporting cuts response times by up to 80%, helping products reach customers faster.Customer trust: Reliable, verified compliance data strengthens relationships and supports long-term growth.

Question 62

What results have companies achieved with Assent?

Accepted Answer

Assent customers like Ryerson and Argon Medical Devices report up to 80% less manual work, 50% lower resource costs, and faster compliance reporting across thousands of products. These measurable results show how Assent turns compliance from a cost center into a growth driver.

Question 63

What to look for in a supply chain sustainability management software?

Accepted Answer

A strong platform does more than collect supplier data, it should also help you stay compliant as regulations evolve and proactively identify risks. Look for product compliance software that combines regulatory updates, automated data validation, and support from regulatory experts.  The best solutions turn complex compliance demands into clear, actionable insights that give you a competitive advantage. Ask potential vendors for customer success stories and independent third-party analysis of their platform.

Question 64

What should organizations look for when evaluating data security in supply chain management software?

Accepted Answer

Data protection should be treated as a core business risk, not a technical detail. Look for software providers that follow recognized security frameworks such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001, apply encryption and access controls, and maintain transparency around data storage, ownership, and governance.

Newsroom

News Releases

Filter by:

AI & Your Sustainable Supply Chain: Perspectives on Technology With Verdantix

The IMI Roadmap to Supply Chain Sustainability With Assent

News Coverage

Filter by:

AI & Your Sustainable Supply Chain: Perspectives on Technology With Verdantix

The IMI Roadmap to Supply Chain Sustainability With Assent

Media Sources

Media Contact

Still Exploring?